With the development of technology, it is easier to reach an information. This development not only makes faster having information but also caused an information pollution. For this reason I strongly agree to the notion of searching from many reliable resources to get right infos. My opinion is based on the following reasons.
First of all, in case of politics, today there are many media organizations which support or supported by some groups and that is why these organizations can make up sided news to impress the community. Both sides could tell or make up a story/news from their point of view. If a person who has no idea about the both sides, that person could get wrong or manipulated ideas because of lack of information. Every organization has rights and wrongs so the most significant thing for them is to express themselves honestly to gain trust and sympathy also more importantly for the benefits of the society.
Secondly, in case of health and sport, there are fake and dangerous websites and blogs which are only founded to make money. These websites do not take into consideration of the human health and psychology. Moreover, the psychology of a sick/ill/injured person is not strong, therefore it is so simple for them to believe everything on the internet. There are many examples on this subject and one of the example is me. I had a stomachache last year and I was in a huge pain. I was in the mood of doing anything to make it go away except for going to a hospital. That is why I was searching for cures on the internet, then I found a recipe and applied it. Next morning I woke up at a hospital because of poisoning. I should not have done directly what I saw on the internet. I should have gone to a doctor instead. Actually, I used to think that I am a knowing person however in case of being sick I easily lost it.
Thirdly, in case of discount news, most of the people are tend to believe any discount news they see but in fact these pages are only intent to rob them. Sometimes people notice this fake pages and spam them on the other hand it could be too late for the others. It is not easy to earn or make money, but unfortunately these robbers do not care about it. For this reason, we should think twice while shopping online.
As a conclusion, we have to look, read and check for a news from many different reliable resources to be well-informed. Otherwise, it would be so easy to be tricked in any circumstance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...f discount news, most of the people are tend to believe any discount news they see b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m them on the other hand it could be too late for the others. It is not easy to e...
^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...on, we have to look, read and check for a news from many different reliable resources ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...to look, read and check for a news from many different reliable resources to be well-informed....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, honestly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, except for, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54157303371 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74260433725 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523595505618 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9337382068 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.84 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.48 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197095260234 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479197762873 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500142079396 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115373546262 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489497406141 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.