Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
Personally, if I have been asked, I would totally agree with the statement that our current lifestyle will impact the future generations to come. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore further in this essay.
First of all, a lot of deforestation is happening around the world as people needs more space for expansion of human race, and they need wood for building homes and furniture. This decrease in trees is further leading to environmental issues as trees help to clean the air by absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen. As oxygen is essential for human and animal life, so with decrease in oxygen in air people are facing a lot of breathing issues. New babies are born with diseases like asthma, which was never heard off before. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Two year ago, when I was planning to expand my family, I started searching for a place to build a new house. The place which I finally settled on, was full of trees and they have to be cut to build our new house. Finally, I used those tress for building my home furniture, but still those trees were gone. This clearly states that if I would not have planned to expand my family, those trees should still have been there and would have provided fresh oxygen full air for other residents in that community.
Secondly, increasing industrialization have further devoted to induce more pollution to the environment in form of Water and Air pollution. With these human activities, wastes generated by these factories are directed either into the air in form of smoke or they are released in water bodies. This release of waste to water is further hampering the water animals like fish which are used by humans as their food in many countries. My neighbor’s experience is a compelling example of this. A year ago, he was blessed with a baby boy. After few me months, they realized that baby used to cough a lot whenever they use to visit market for getting some household items. They were quick to consult a doctor regarding this and were shocked to know that their baby has a bronchitis problem which was caused when he was still in his mother’s womb due to them living near industrial area while she was pregnant. It clearly depicts that if our environment would have been better, my neighbor’s son would not have faced this issue early in his life.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that our lifestyle will impact negatively the future generations. This is because increase of population is leading to cutting of trees, and because of massive industrialization going on these days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 814, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'those tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; those tresses
...to build our new house. Finally, I used those tress for building my home furniture, but sti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 618, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... baby used to cough a lot whenever they use to visit market for getting some househ...
^^^
Line 9, column 957, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...clearly depicts that if our environment would have been better, my neighbor's son would no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, while, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76872246696 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68692224051 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508810572687 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.212070404 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.095238095 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164475012306 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566153709805 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959275252243 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150815575966 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103330173828 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.