Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world has been changing at an astonishing rate in the past decades, leading to enormous shifts in people's daily life. Whether we can identify a secure and successful occupation more easily than in the past has aroused a wide discussion. I hold that it was easier to recognize the jobs that were safer and more prosperous in the past.
To begin with, competition is increasing in the contemporary work market, which leads to less opportunity to grasp a prosperous job. Specifically, the number of well-educated employees is soaring with the improvement of the education system. Therefore, when more and more qualified people are applying for well-paid jobs, employers will reduce the salary to help select the candidates. As a result, this job becomes not as attractive as before. For example, programmer is an occupation with a high salary. Ten years ago, an average programmer working in Tictok could buy a house located in Beijing with ease. However, the one with moderate ability in Tictok can only pay for a house with the help of loans. Hence, we have to take the fierce competition into account when considering a career, which makes the decision more difficult.
Second, the market is constantly changing today so it is tricky to determine a prospective job. In the past, the work circumstances were relatively stable. Therefore, people usually took up only one job during their whole career. However, today, numerous workers choose to change their job frequently in order to seize the most perspective field. They are busy quitting an old job, learning new knowledge, and searching for a new job. For instance, twenty years ago, biology was a quite prosperous field that attracted considerable students and workers. Nevertheless, today, working in the field of biology is not such intriguing, and many graduates majoring in biology cannot find a satisfactory job. Thus, identifying a changing thing is more challenging.
Admittedly, we have easier access to all kinds of information today. On the Internet, we can easily browse for ample recruitment advertisements and working experiences. However, this information online is prone to be fake. My own experience can serve as a compelling example. Last spring, when I was searching for an internship online, I found countless advertisements that provided false job information and numerous recruiters who pretended to offer fascinating opportunities. By contrast, in the past, this information is usually published in the newspaper, which is much more credible.
In conclusion, finding a safe and prosperous job is far more difficult in today's society than before because of the increasing competition, changing market, and fake information today.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30324074074 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06316305355 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2536883785 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1153846154 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6153846154 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26923076923 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138408809637 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399711258244 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325017634927 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808779068181 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505641898212 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.