It is critically important that we comprehend the proper elements of teaching skills. Personally, I believe that people who have a tough time learning new skills are the people who can teach this skill very well. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when individuals face some difficulties in learning new skills, they will try to do their best to absorb and understand them. For example, they will tend to learn these skills from various resources and ask experts about the skills. Consequently, they will build a better understanding. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was in high school, I used to get low grades in Math. However, after I attended college, I tried my best to overcome the difficulties in math. I studied from different books, watched many math tutorials on the internet, and eventually, I become skillful in math. Now I am teaching this subject to my students.
Furthermore, facing difficulties always make people more persistent to be deft. Which means they will be the best educators for the skills that they used to have problems with. For instance, in my second year in college, I used to have some difficulties in Organic chemistry. It was a hard subject and need a lot of attention. But, I was insistent to master this subject. Eventually, I got the highest mark in the class and now I am teaching my sister how to form organic chemical reactions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the people who face difficulties in learning specific skills are the people who will be the best educators for these specific skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85053380783 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86039541529 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526690391459 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7193332131 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7222222222 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262907918064 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723476785116 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976115931183 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196740323464 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866254037902 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.