Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers to that skill than people who learned it easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I would have to agree with the statement that people who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned it easily. I am basing this opinion on several reasonos and personal experiences which will be discused thoroughly in this essay.
First of all, people who have had some difficulty learning a skill spent much more time doing it and are, therefore, in my opinion, much likely to succead in it. If they have had spent hundreds of hours learning it they would naturally possess more knowlage of the subject than someone who learned it easily and spent just a few hours practicing. Secondly, people who have had trouble learning a perticular skill also have an idea what is the thoughest part of learning it, where would a student possibly need help, what areas do student needs to focus on, ect. I also think that these people would be much more understanding and could easily make a conection with their students. This would provide a healthier and more comfortable enviroment for studying and because of that students would not hesetate to ask questions and would be encourage to admite if they too have a problem with something.
For example, in my second year of collage, I have had a really hard time understanding genetics. Because of that, I spent hours and hours everyday studying the theoretical problems in my textbooks. Also, I spent much more time in the lab then my collages because I was trying to conect all the things I have read with all the things I have seen that afternoon in the lab. Because of this, I was not able to go out with my friends that much or do some other fun stuff, but I could honestly say now that it was all worth it. Now I have students of my own and I am really trying to help them in any way possible because I personally know how hard it can sometimes be.
Because of all these reasons and my personal struggle with genetics I am positive that people who have had some minor difficulties learning a skill early on are now much better teachers than people who learned it easily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54787234043 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48705908236 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465425531915 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3816127021 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9230769231 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371205298374 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154520738216 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191198817873 0.0737576698707 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308753722306 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161874265663 0.0645574589148 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.