Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Not many people today could imagine life without technology. There is no dough that technology has made our lives easier, but since I can remember there is one question being asked: “Has technology made the world a better place to live?”. I would have to argue that technology hasn’t in fact made the world a better place to live. The reasons to suport this statement are practicly endless and some of them will be thorougly discussed in this essay.
First of all, let’s begin with human contact. Rapid development of computer tehnology and uncountable number of new social media apps affected human interaction in segnificant way. Teenagers are much more likely to sit at home and chat with one another then to go out and actually spend some time together. Young girls and boys in elementary school or in high school are today practicly addicted to various violent, booldy videogames and spend hours in front of the computer. Development of TV technology had a similar effect on young people. Today, parents are leaving their children in fornt of the TV for hours instead of playing with them. We can also witness all kinds of bad behevior on TV shows witch is then translated to the way young minds are shaped and to the way they later behave in life.
Next, let’s talk about auto industry. As we can see today the pollution has reach its maximum. The air pollution is catastrofic in the big industial cities. Practicly every person in them has a car. It is deffenetly the easiest way to move around big city but at what cost. More and more people are getting sick from breading the polluted air. We are witnesing the huge increase in number of loung and throught cancer patients as well as astma patients.
Last but not least, let’s take a look on robotics. Today, there is a machine for practicly everything. We use machins for everyday activities like heating up our meals and doing our londory, but there are also machines witch work in the lab, in the factories or as the telephone operaters. This brings a question: “If robots can do the same work humans can for less money, are they gonna replace humans?”.
All of this should be able to ilustrate that eventho technology is making our lives easier it’s not quite making this planet a better place for living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | WatermelonUCLA | 86 | view |
| 2020-11-05 | Isidora | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | Englishman | 87 | view |
| 2016-06-16 | trang2 | 75 | view |
| 2015-10-11 | samah ae | 85 | view |
- Do you agree od disagree with the following statement Students are more influences by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement It is more important to keep your old friends 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made the world a better place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- What are the important qualities of a good son or daughter Have these qualities change or remained the same over time in your culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Your city or province has received a large donation of money to improve the education of children It must choose between spending the money on the improvement of early childhood education for children ages 4 to 7 and spending money on the improvement of e 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Next, let’s talk about auto industry. As we can see today the pollution has reac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, then, well, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74686716792 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44852791986 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583959899749 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5535851992 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.347826087 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.347826087 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160775693551 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038899448651 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723362565565 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917336487322 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974951563245 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.