Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Primary school students (aged 5-10) should do no more than 30 minutes of homework every night because they already get enough instructions in regular classes at school.
It is incontrovertible that students need to learn their studies through their schools. After all, all students need to be taught in order to learn their studies. Yet, there could be a debate over whether students should give much homework or not. Some might argue that we should talk to students, age 5-10, in doing their homework for more than 30 minutes. However, I strongly believe that we must not force students, aged 5-10, to do their homework more than 30 minutes a day for two reasons.
To begin with, those students are at the best of their age, helping them to learn everything so easily. In other words, their teachers can teach them without tremendous pressure because they can get everything fast. From my personal experience, I had to do my homework only 30 minutes a day while 9. Upon going to school, I just sat on a chair and listened to my teacher carefully. I remember that I could learn mathematics and sciences with my eyes closed. This was because hardly ever did I forget something, with the sense that I could sink every material into my head because of my age. In the beginning, wanting to pass my exams with flying colors, I made up my mind to take great pains and do my homework for 2 hours a day. Soon, I realized that it is not to my benefit to burning the midnight oil, that is, I learned everything very well in school, with the result that it was better to allocate only 30 minutes of my time to practice what I learned in school. Consequently, had not I been 8 years old, I would not have learned everything so fast and easily.
Another major consideration is that, in this way, students aged 5-10 can learn something else. This means that they can learn and brush up on their homework so easily, and they should not focus on their homework exceedingly; hence, they are better off learning new things. To illustrate this, one should see no further than learning sports and some programming languages and playing musical instruments. Many students, aged 5-10, are of some interesting skills, such as playing football, working with computers well, and playing piano like a professional. This is because they can balance the many tasks, leading them to multitask. Through this process, although it is difficult, they can make a plethora of progress in the future. Therefore, we can assume that not only can such children learn to do several tasks at the same time but also they are on the right track, leading them to make good at their future jobs.
In summary, there are numerous reasons to believe that we should coerce students aged 5-10 into doing their homework not more than 30 minutes. This is because they do not need more than 30 minutes, and it gives them great advantages over the other students to learn other prominent skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is incontrovertible that students nee...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than 30 minutes a day for two reasons. To begin with, those students are at the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learned everything so fast and easily. Another major consideration is that, in ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem to make good at their future jobs. In summary, there are numerous reasons t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, after all, in summary, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65580448065 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4985508968 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488798370672 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4740809498 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3913043478 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2867753773 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913641572584 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644897756124 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198785104605 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466747893438 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.