There are different opinions on whether, nowadays, young people are living under more strict rules than they were before or not. Even though some people think today's societies apply more stringent rules to youth than they did in the past, I believe otherwise, maintaining that the young generation of the modern world are living under relatively favorable social condition and less strict regulation compared to their previous generation, for instance, their parents. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is the many strict rules used to exist in various societies, most of which do not exist anymore. For example, in my country, young people had to marry at a young age, before reaching their 20th, to whom their parents decided not to one they loved. Take my mother as an example, my grandfather made my mother marry her cousin, whom she did not love, and after two years, they divorced. If it had not been because of the absurd rules, my mother would have enjoyed her life better during those years. Today, however, young people, even in my country, choose when to marry and whom to marry, and this fact is entirely acceptable in every society. Therefore, this reason manifests that societies do not act as rigorously as they used to do toward young people in the past.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is technological improvement and progress during the last decades, particularly the vast access to the internet. People, especially young ones, increase their knowledge of other cultures and societies' conditions through the computer and the internet. Therefore, the society in which they live cannot make them follow some strict rules that are not widespread in other cultures. Take one of the strict rules in my country that has been abolished recently. In my country, until last year, women did not have permission to work and drive, but thanks to the internet, public knowledge has been improved, and some campaigns against this rule have been established in social media. As a result, they now have the right to drive and work. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that many stringent rules that used to exist have been repealed in recent decades.
All in all, many people are in favor of the notion that today's societies execute many unfair and stringent rules on youth. Nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that neither do nowadays cultures have rigid regulations as they had in the past, nor can they enact stringent rules.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04008908686 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56058866328 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516703786192 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9366005422 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.722222222 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9444444444 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185794734042 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656614337168 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543726602844 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117215550366 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142627021951 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.