Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that the whole society today expect young people to follow are too strict.
Rules are the basic principles of our day to day life; hence, the behavior of people should not go beyond the lines circumscribed by rules. Indeed, rules are strong weapons to maintain peace and harmony in any given society. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether in today's hectic city of life, rules that crowds of young people should keep track of them, are strict. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that nowadays, rules are dependent on the places, situations and times. So, these factors should be taken into consideration in order to distinguish whether a rule is strict or not. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that rules play an important role in nations owing to the fact that they contribute greatly to the harmony of a society. Broadly speaking, many aspects of a rule like condition, place and time should be considered carefully to determine whether a rule is strict or not. As a vivid example, students at the school are required to study hard in order to receive an excellent score. Strict rules here could work properly and effectively owing to the fact that if students are not responsible for their education, then, strict rules could force them to follow their study and reach a tertiary education. To elucidate more on this issue, strict rules are not fundamentally hard and ineffective because not only can they keep harmony in the society but also can help people in their personal lives.
Another equally salient example in corroborating my stance is children who are deprived of watching TV by their parents. If we take a minute to ponder over it, at a first glance this rule might seem unfavorable to children, but obviously this strict rule could provide an opportunity for children to lead a healthy life. In fact, radiations emitted by the screen could have deleterious effects for their eye-sight in the long run. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that strict rules might have positive effects in many cases as mentioned above. Although they might be unpleasant for people, they will run into a favorable condition.
However, every coin has two sides. Rules are now stricter than past time and myriads of people have to act based on these rules. For instance, rules in a high ranked university, are now harder owing to the fact that dropout rate is increasing extensively among college students. So, this could lead to some negative consequences because there is no need to enact strict rules in the university. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to m personal viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether in todays hectic city of life, rules th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... two sides. Rules are now stricter than past time and myriads of people have to act based...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, as to, broadly speaking, for instance, in fact, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9175257732 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65666402608 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542268041237 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6867875748 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.409090909 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0454545455 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188761454559 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490547279066 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418023449554 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920997522582 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656039573637 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.