Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on young children’s education rather than on universities.
The university is an academic center, the main responsibility of which is to prepare students for having both a successful profession and personal life. Arguably, hardly can any society gets improve without universities. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should spend a hoard of money on children's education or on universities in order to help improve the country. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that although children's education is of utmost important issues in any country, allocate a vast sum of money to universities would be more beneficial for the whole society. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, high ranked and prominent universities always have played a key role in the success of a nation. So, it is incumbent upon the government to allot a substantial amount of budget on universities. Generally phrased, spend money on children's education might not be a wise decision owing to the fact that vast majorities of children are not interested in the higher education. As a palpable example, based on a record conducted in my hometown, a plethora of children prefer to work and accumulate a vast sum of money than study and reach a tertiary education in their personal lives. So, dedicate money to children's education might be waste of time and money. To elucidate more on this issue, the more money allocated to the university, the more development we would be able to see throughout the society. In fact, not only can the university improve but also can arouse a nation to be flourished.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that universities require a huge budget in order to fulfill their needs and develop their facilities. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of children who make efforts and bend over backward to enter the university should be supported and funded in order to be able to put their knowledge into practice. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that it is necessarily needed to support the university because the success of students, as well as the nation, largely depends on the budget allocation by the government. Otherwise, we soon should witness the society falling behind.
However, every coin has two sides. We all know that children are the pillars of every given nation and they play a pivotal role in the future of the country. So, investment in children's education not only will guarantee the future lives of children but also will guarantee the success of a nation in the long run. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should spend a hoard of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90342052314 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84640200611 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496981891348 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7367388724 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.047619048 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221530795583 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623207626328 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521343195498 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107458802654 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787768877624 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.