Students can learn many things in their school. Either from their theacher or their friends. For me, I believe that teacher give more influence to students than their friends do. I hold this opinion for three following reasons.
First of all, teachers have more stable emotion than the friends students. The teacher will manage their emotion stable and more objective to solve a problem for instance. It is very useful because the students can overcome some problem with cold headed with the help of their teachers. On the other hand, the friends students who has same age period with the students is likey more unstable. Thus, it will make the problem not getting done objectively.
Second, the students can imitate the teacher leadership skill in classes. This skills is very important nowadays because it will help the students become active in organization. Moreover, they can show their leadership and actually become a head of that organization. Their friends will not have such skill because lack of experience.
Third, most of time that is spend between the students and their friend is only for studying and playing. So there will be less influence that the students can get from their friends. However, when it comes to interaction betweeen students and teacher, there will be more advanced discussion and somehow the students can be influenced from it. For example, when come the time for students to console with the teacher. The teacher can give another insight based from their experience.
In summary, teacher will give more effects to students than by their friends. The teachers have more stable emotion, leadership skill, and more experience.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem60
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take basic science courses even if it is not the field of their study.60
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'aged'.
...hand, the friends students who has same age period with the students is likey more ...
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
...he teacher leadership skill in classes. This skills is very important nowadays becau...
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
...eadership skill in classes. This skills is very important nowadays because it will...
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
...erience. Third, most of time that is spend between the students and their friend i...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, moreover, second, so, third, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15073529412 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44551074742 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488970588235 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3254154763 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.05 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340696325048 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128015213876 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800076235716 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231549038066 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781529781765 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.