Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process.
In today’s hectic life, vast lifestyle changes have made individuals ask leaders for advice to make wise decisions and be successful in life. The majority of people think that a leader had better take advice from group members in order to consider all the options for his final choice. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that a sophisticated guide must ignore others’ advice. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, a leader is major responsible for the prospective outcomes; hence should be both meticulous and decisive in his decision-making. Otherwise, others’ opinions may change his mind, and lead to erroneous conclusions; eventually, if anything bad happens, all will hold him accountable. As a case in point, when I was an adolescent, my close friends and I were going to take a several-day trip to the surrounding countryside. It was such an arduous program that we had to hire a mountain guide who was unfortunately inexperienced. All the time, some of my friends were suggesting where to go, and the guide was taking their advice without any further consideration. Only after a few hours, the mountain guide voiced his doubt and uttered we were lost. While we had got increasingly anxious and visibly disappointed, fortunately, we found the right track. As I was able to predict, none of them took the burden of that failure. Had the leader ignored others’ suggestions, we would not have been involved in such a formidable plight.
The other point worth mentioning is that the leader is expert in his province, whereas people have neither awareness nor background in that area. There are some arguing that all group members should declare their standpoints because the more opinions, the better decision. Nevertheless, I find this idea absolutely absurd since only an expert could weigh the possible results, and consequently, make tough decisions in different situations. By way of illustration, it is crystal clear that a teacher cannot ask the students to figure out what the best method of teaching is, because the teacher is the one who has been educated in that major. This example reveals why a leader should only rely on his experiences for making decisions.
In conclusion, it is crucial that a skillful leader adopt all of decisions, not only because of admitting the responsibility of the probable outcomes but also for his profound knowledge and worthwhile experiences in that specific field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-21 | P@rs@ | 95 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | baharddd | 76 | view |
| 2017-03-10 | Angelina2016 | 85 | view |
| 2015-01-02 | elhamtgh66 | 80 | view |
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13902439024 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01667879987 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587804878049 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0032547152 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.894736842 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142164934449 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423999361843 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051161126944 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859482882296 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447093344679 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.