Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers’ performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that teachers play a consequential role in any given society owing to the fact that they put their efforts so as to help students make a progress day in day out. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the performance of teachers should be assessed by students or other teachers. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that students are familiar with teachers' style of teaching, hallmarks, trait, and behavior and so forth because they are in a close contact with them. So, students can assess better than anyone else. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, students and teachers are the pillars of every nation because improvement and development of a society largely depend on their performances in the academic setting. Broadly speaking, students spend most of their precious time with their teachers, so, they could evaluate performances of teachers precisely and meticulously. As a tangible example, during school years, students live with their teachers and they are able to become acquainted with the positive and negative feature, teaching style, mood and many other characteristics, which are necessary when it comes to evaluation of teachers. Although teachers might be familiar with each other, they might not be able, to tell the truth, because they are not in a close relationship. To elucidate more on this issue, if we want to witness an impeccable assessment, we have to rely on students opinions. Otherwise, not only can the performances of teachers be spurious but also can prevent teachers from making a conspicuous progress.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that teachers have always tried to guide students to continue their study and reach an impressive education in their personal lives. If we take a minute to ponder over it, students can assess their teachers because they are able to distinguish whether their teachers' information and knowledge were useful or not. Indeed, knowledge and experience of teachers play a key role and are two of the most significant hallmarks that any teacher needs to carry. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that these knowledge and experience are only measurable by students because these experiences form their future lives and make known whether they could be successful or not.
However, every coin has two sides. In any case, students might not be able to assess their teachers due to the fact that they only evaluate based on grades they receive. For example, a plethora of students is not able to compete and perform well at school because they are not interested in their education. So, they introduce their teachers as the main reason for their defeats. In such cases, students are not mature enough for evaluation. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to the fact that they put their efforts so as to help students make a progress day in da...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the performance of teachers should be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 982, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'conspicuous progress'.
Suggestion: conspicuous progress
...t also can prevent teachers from making a conspicuous progress. Another equally salient point in co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...th of coverage and depth of detail that these knowledge and experience are only measurable by s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, broadly speaking, for example, by and large, in any case, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03773584906 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75269763153 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488679245283 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 825.3 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3113126862 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248907296934 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817197733559 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064970951833 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137560022741 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956249123875 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.