Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is indisputable that teachers play a pivotal role in guiding and teaching students in the classroom. They provide students with generous knowledge that enlightens their paths for the future. However, should teachers make their social or political views known to students in the classroom? some people concur with the statement but, personally, I contend this opinion for two reasons that will be explored in the following essay.
Firstly, time spent classroom is valuable to both the students and the teachers. It should be well spent for the students' academic sake. Teachers have enormous knowledge that is entitled in their specialties. This precious knowledge should be passed on to students during class time. To elaborate more, teachers should engage their students in open discussions about their queries related to specific academic subjects rather than discussing political and social viewpoints. Eventually, a well-spent session time will reflect on the students' academic progress and the teachers’ reputation as well. in other words, Students' impressive results have a greater impact on teachers' reputation than their political and social viewpoints. Accordingly, teachers shouldn't waste their students' time debating politics and social matters.
Secondly, when teachers make their political and social viewpoints known to students, they may influence them. As a matter of fact, students usually don’t have a definite standpoint. Actually, they are quite naive because they are busy paying all their attention to studying and academic issues. Therefore, when teachers spend a great part of the class session talking about their political and academic standpoints, this will eventually influence their students’ points of view. For example, my teacher is anti-government, and he mentions his opinions on many occasions about governmental issues. Obviously, my classmates are affected by his opinions, and they as well repel any achievements employed by the government. For this matter, teachers should be aware of their possessions on their students and discontinue expressing their viewpoints in the classroom.
To sum up, teachers are great mentors who prepare their students for the future. Their influence on their lives should be done with great care and awareness without negatively affecting their academic progress and political viewpoints.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ews known to students in the classroom? some people concur with the statement but, p...
^^^^
Line 2, column 598, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s and the teachers’ reputation as well. in other words, Students impressive result...
^^
Line 2, column 667, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...essive results have a greater impact on teachers reputation than their political and soc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 753, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ocial viewpoints. Accordingly, teachers shouldnt waste their students time debating poli...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, talking about, as a matter of fact, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70621468927 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84797883312 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511299435028 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5749663569 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1904761905 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340661317919 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123244529366 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970119445623 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240894219556 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689639947319 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.