Throughout the history teacher play a substantial role in a student's life. It is the most controversial question that salary provides to teachers on basis students learning rate. Teachers as much as try to teach the best and in the present situation, college and school hire educated, knowledgeable and experienced professor for increase performance of students in a study. From my vantage point, I disagree above the statement that teacher should be paid on the how much students learn because of discouraging to the teacher, vast of factor affect the students study not only teacher and different tactic use for the better teaching style.
To begin with, Evaluation of the teachers by the students learning process is a negative impact on teachers and students because of lower paid may discourage the teacher and change the method of teaching, if this changes to students have more problem in their study. For example, if students do not understand any lecture then ask about to professor and if the professor says no then reasonable to cut their salary but if professor works hard to teach the students then the bad idea to cut their salary. Besides, the find good knowledgeable and educated professors are hard if the teacher suddenly left their job with unsatisfied salary then what is a consequence of the students study.
Furthermore, Huge of factors affect the students learning process such as the absence of mind, physical and mental stress, unwillingness for study and so on… this factor hinder to learn the process. If students cannot understand the lecture then it is not teacher fault because of most of the lecture teacher allow to students to question about any queries. It is unfair to teachers that they give put their whole energy for students study.
Moreover, if teaching method not proper in that reason to the increase the drop rate of a particular subject then university and school organize the specific tactic to encourage the teacher to work hard and teach the variety of the method for students. For example, students get the higher grades on a particular subject then this subject of the teachers to give reward and prizes as result, professors attract this rewarding and work better than earlier.
In conclusion, teachers are important for the student life and appraisal of the teacher causes discouragement. I suggest that teacher should never pay on based on the how much their students learn because of in the student learning activity not only play teacher role but also other activities influence to their study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ry teacher play a substantial role in a students life. It is the most controversial ques...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to rate'
Suggestion: to rate
... to teachers on basis students learning rate. Teachers as much as try to teach the b...
^^^^
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...tatement that teacher should be paid on the how much students learn because of discoura...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... that teacher should be paid on the how much students learn because of discouraging ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...at teacher should never pay on based on the how much their students learn because of in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04964539007 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68997284854 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8753968796 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.571428571 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2142857143 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297661424219 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12214358024 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664807667757 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185710306621 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650168515931 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.