The teachers are indisputable have a significant role to empower young generations in a year to come. Some people contend that the teachers should pay on the basis of how much students will learn since it will inspire them to improve their performance to increase the rate of success. However, I think teachers should not get a salary for their class results because only teachers are not responsible for the learning process of their students because all the students do not have the same learning abilities and it can also make the teachers dishonest.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that teachers are not the only people who are responsible for the students’ studies. Students themselves and other people, who take care of students after school, are also responsible for their academic accomplishments. A teacher does not have enough time in a class to give individual attention to every student. For instance, A teacher has thirty to forty-five minutes period to teach a class of thirty students. She can not give more than one minute to every student because, in this short period, She has to take attendance of students, deliver the lecture, and check the homework. Parents and other caregivers are responsible for their learning after school to improve their grades. They have the responsibility to ask the students to do their homework. Therefore, school management can not evaluate a teacher’s teaching abilities by their student's results because she is not the only person who is responsible for their studies.
Another reason that deserves more word is that every student gains knowledge with his natural ability to learn. It is not necessary that all students will learn something at the same time. For example, in a class, some students give more concentration on studies, and some take extra time to learn something. A student who has Autism will concentrate less than an average student. As a result, the results of a class will not be uniform. Teachers should not be paid according to their students learning amount because in a class some students learn actively and some passively.
The last but not the least, maybe, teachers become dishonest when they are paid by their students learning. They will not teach them to clear their concepts which can be helpful in their future practical life. Instead of that, they will be worried about the results of the tests and exams of the students. For example, they teach only the topics which they are going to give in the reviews because they will want their students to get good grades. That is because they know that if the ranks of the students will be good, then their salary will be increased. If a school administration gives salary to a teacher by their student's results, the teacher will become dishonest towards her duties.
In conclusion, Teachers should not be getting paid on the basis of their students learning because many other people than teachers are responsible for students academic success. All the students do not have the same abilities to learn. It can make the teacher dishonest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...teachers should pay on the basis of how much students will learn since it will inspi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 504, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to amount'
Suggestion: to amount
...id according to their students learning amount because in a class some students learn ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01934235977 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66995056988 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390715667311 0.524837075471 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7566715204 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8076923077 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8846153846 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292957909391 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105111874391 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616473208137 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208477335679 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414473047215 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.