Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the modern era, teachers are regarded as crucial factors contributing to the thriving of students in different aspects of their lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the off-topic discussions in the classrooms. Many people adhere to the view that it is not the responsibility of teachers to speak about the political issues in the class, while others believe that these sessions are essential for the future of teenagers. Ego, when it comes to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that talking about social perspectives should not be banned in the class. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that in some countries, the regimes deprive people of gaining adequate information about their surroundings by using censorship alongside strict laws. As a result, people in the community are brainwashed with false news, which helps the governments increase their control over civilians. As teachers start to bring up specific criteria in the discussions, youngsters begin to think about them so that they will not accept anything that is fed to them by national media. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During high school, I was a strong proponent of our government because they accentuated their tiniest achievements, and kept saying our country is the best. However, during an argument with one of my teachers about our political thoughts, I found out that I was fooled and I should not have trusted that news because they were biased. Thus, I stopped my blinded support.

Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that by speaking about controversial matters, students learn about how to represent their beliefs and ideas which is vital for them as they are preparing for stepping into more significant communities. Learning how to defend our thoughts or even accept the perspectives that are against ours is not a one-night success. For instance, during high school, in the physics class, the instructor started talking about previous regimes. He was a strong advocate of them, and he was bragging about how good they were, and they lead our country toward success. However, I know they were not the angles he was describing, so without getting angry, I persuaded him that he was wrong. At first, he resisted a little bit, but he found my statements logical. Thus, I learned that I could be persuasive and tell my thoughts without making a fight or being rude. This behavior aids me to talk about my different opinions with my co-workers without any troubles.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is beneficial if teachers talk about their views in the class. This is because they can provide more information for the young generation than tv programs, and we can learn social skills in these sessions.

Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 752, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...t he was wrong. At first, he resisted a little bit, but he found my statements logical. Th...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, speaking about, talking about, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2459.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01836734694 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79247590845 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9315440469 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.772727273 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128461437826 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394198008593 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283226762235 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891347495952 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396506775388 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.