Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of using cars in the modern life. If i were forced to choose, I would definitely think that in twenty years there will be more cars in use than there are today. Even tough, some people believe that there will be fewer cars for next twenty years because of their environmental issues but in my firm belief that is not going to happen for two reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, I think that car factory are making so much money from selling cars and it does not seem that they want to change their path by selling less cares because they do not want to loose that profits of their companies. For example, nowadays, there are hundreds car companies in the world and the number of them have immense increase over the last decades. They selling their product and they do not want to stop this process and as much as cars product in the world as long as people are going to buy it to make their life easier. You can see that the demand's of people for buying more cars is not decreasing and that has an enormous effect on the car company to make more money and have a better profits. For this reason I believe that car producing company are not going to change their decision to produce fewer cars ,therefore, the amount of cars in the future is not going diminish.
Secondly, in my opinion, the development of the cities is one of the reason that the urge for using cars in the future is going to grow. Nowadays, the cities developed and in order to access different part of the city is major reason that people want to buy and use cars. For instance, one of the city in Iran which name is Karaj. In the past this city was not big or crowded. Most of the people in this area used to work in other cities and nobody liked to live there. In that point you could easily go from one side of the city to the other side and you could do this even with walking because the city was not big enough to made you use any transportation but now that specific city turn into some big and crowded city. People come to this city to live and as a result of this development, there is no way that you can now wander in the city by walking. Now you need to use cars and other type of transportation to wander around this city. It is certainly clear to see that city development has huge influence on the using more cars in the cities.
In light of above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that in the future there are going to be more cars in all around the worlds than today and I believe that city development and massive production of the car factories are two major reasons that have immense effect on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ts of using cars in the modern life. If i were forced to choose, I would definite...
^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cares is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ey want to change their path by selling less cares because they do not want to loose...
^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... less cares because they do not want to loose that profits of their companies. For ex...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 830, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nge their decision to produce fewer cars ,therefore, the amount of cars in the fut...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29126213592 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16507379497 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403883495146 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4146393575 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6111111111 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244095605068 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895257266399 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686550805176 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162439072599 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697174336437 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.