A controversy which is raised about the cost of providing education to students. Some groups of people hold the view that education should not be provided free of charge to allow the university to cover its cost. However, some other groups may hold a different view and feel that university should provide education free of charge. From my vantage point, I concur with the latest view and feel that students should not be withheld from enrolling to universities because of financial issues.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that it is unfair for students to be withheld from from attending universities because of their financial needs. Such right has been provided by the constitution regardless of race. Whether a student is rich or poor, black or white, all are being treated equally and the only factor which should be considered is their educational achievements. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is the number of students who were able to attend university upon my graduation. Only a limited group who were able the financial cost were able to be admitted.
The second reason which deserves some thought is that free education to students may reduce the gap between the rich and the poor. Many scholars are divided on how can governments reduce this gap. In my opinion. allowing free education may contribute significantly to reduce this gap.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first one to cross my mind, they are by no mean the only reason available. In fact, there is another subtle point which is worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible statistics that was published in the American Journal of education. The study revealed that free education may help poor families to get support to educate their children inspite of being incapable to cover this cost. The study was conducted on students from multiple schools to prevent any bias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reason. on's soon realizes the importance of providing free education to students. such support would not help students to learn, but give a chance to improve their socioeconomic status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...t is unfair for students to be withheld from from attending universities because of their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Allowing
...rnments reduce this gap. In my opinion. allowing free education may contribute significa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of being incapable to cover this cost. The study was conducted on students from mu...
^^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ons
...ontemplating the aforementioned reason. ons soon realizes the importance of providi...
^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...f providing free education to students. such support would not help students to lear...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11581920904 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80799628144 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522598870056 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6224243067 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2380952381 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248982455804 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721071691688 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576973163985 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135501997728 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512790731958 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.