The article and the lecture both discuss how humpback whales navigate long distances in the oceans. The reading claims that they navigate with the assistance of stars.The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessment and contends that it navigates through other means
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is the complexity of the brain which assists humpback whale to navigate.The lecturer refuted this point by stating that other non-intelligent animals can also navigate with the stars assistance. Thus, intelligence may not necessarily be related to navigation.
Secondly, The lecturer does not agree with with the points made by the author that humpback whales move in straight line because of stars. He contends that instead humpback whales move in straight line because of magnetite, a sensory organ in the brain, which functions to direct whales in straight line with the assistance of magnetic field. Ultimately, whale are able to move in such an organized way.
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that whales spy-hop to navigate with stars assistance. He contends that sharks do the same movement, however, not for navigating the ocean, but to search for food.Besides, whale sky hop during the day when no stars are in the sky. Therefore, this movement serves other purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...y navigate with the assistance of stars.The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y navigate with the assistance of stars.The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...tars.The lecturer, however, refutes the authors assessment and contends that it navigat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat it navigates through other means The first allegation of the script against ...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...hich assists humpback whale to navigate.The lecturer refuted this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hich assists humpback whale to navigate.The lecturer refuted this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stars'' or 'star's'?
Suggestion: stars'; star's
...gent animals can also navigate with the stars assistance. Thus, intelligence may not ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
... Secondly, The lecturer does not agree with with the points made by the author that hump...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...ating the ocean, but to search for food.Besides, whale sky hop during the day when no s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38028169014 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72629718382 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 113.17941618 49.2860985944 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377222358103 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150232015618 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614546542063 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221285672917 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124941028619 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.