he lecturer disputes the author's suggested theory that an abrupt decline in sea water level caused a massive extinction in the Triassic period. She provides several concrete reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the author a significant decrease in sea water level caused a massive extinction of living species. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. she asserts that a gradual decrease in sea water level does not cause a massive killing because animals living in shallow water can adapt to the change in sea water level.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that a decrease in temperature is the reason behind this massive killing. She contends that a decrease in temperature could cause massive killing if it was for a long period of time. However, The lecturer points out that theoretically speaking the rain may have washed all the sulfur dioxide in the air. Thus, the elevation in temperature was last for only a short period.
Finally, the lecturer argues that no crater was discovered at the site of the collision. The author argues that a debris which block the sun light may have caused this massive extinction. However, the lecturer also disputes this point. She argues that the only crater discovered was 12 million years before the Triassic period. Thus, it is very unlikely that an asteroid collision may have caused this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he lecturer disputes the authors suggested...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...the lecturer finds this idea debatable. she asserts that a gradual decrease in sea ...
^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...se massive killing if it was for a long period of time. However, The lecturer points out that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that a debris which block the sun light may have caused this massive extinction....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09012875536 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53105379376 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502145922747 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.24432025 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7142857143 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19197021583 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723191163183 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531607999122 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114567701867 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201683352738 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.