The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the way agnostids lived long time ago. The reading claims that those marine animals were sea floor dwellers and parasites. However, the lecturer refutes the author's assessment. She demonstrate three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading
.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is possibility that agnositdes were predators.The lecturer refutes this point by stating that predators should have large eyes to be able to attack it's pray. However, the fossil remains of such arthropods does not show that they did. In fact, it shows that they barely they had undeveloped eye and they could barely see. Thus, it is unlikely that they were predators.
secondly, according to the text it is possible that agnosides were seafloor dwellers.The speaker also find this idea debatable. She bolsters her opinion by stating that seafloor dwellers are slow movers, and do not cross large distances. However, the remains of agnosides shows the contrary. She asserts that the remains were spread over large areas. thus, they are not dwellers.
Lastly, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that agnosides were parasites. The professor again disagree with the author. He contends that parasites should be small in numbers. However, the fossil remains of agnosides indicate that they were large in number. Being large in number means that they cannot be parasites because other wise they would eat there pray.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ites. However, the lecturer refutes the authors assessment. She demonstrate three reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'demonstrates'.
Suggestion: demonstrates
...rer refutes the authors assessment. She demonstrate three reasons to cast doubt on the clai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...doubt on the claims made in the reading . The first allegation of the script aga...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...sibility that agnositdes were predators.The lecturer refutes this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...s unlikely that they were predators. secondly, according to the text it is possible t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e that agnosides were seafloor dwellers.The speaker also find this idea debatable. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...e remains were spread over large areas. thus, they are not dwellers. Lastly, the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...ns of agnosides indicate that they were large in number. Being large in number means that they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...e that they were large in number. Being large in number means that they cannot be parasites bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
...s that they cannot be parasites because other wise they would eat there pray.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 52.1666666667 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25619834711 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45961814471 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2558345741 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6666666667 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4444444444 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130557337707 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421304305577 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404813521812 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790295969644 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240730286373 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.