A controversial debate is raised about the quality of good leaders. Some people hold the view that good ;leaders should not take into consideration other people's ideas. However, some others may have a different view and believe that it is better to be open minded and listen to other people's ideas. Form my vantage point, I concur with the later group for that open minded people can enhance their knowledge and be more communicative with others.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that by listening to others, leaders can enhance their knowledge. leaders who are open minded take the opportunity to listen to people and learn from them. Without listening to the concerns of others a leader would no be able to accomplish his tasks properly. A vivid example which can illustrate by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees. After several years of continuous denial, many of his best performing members of his team quite the company. Therefore, failure to others lead no only the failure of the leader but also to significant losses by the company.
The second reason which deserves some attention is that leaders who listen to others make employees happy. Employees who feels that there are nobody listening to them, develop low self esteem and loose motivation. An important duty of a leader is to keep employees motivated. Without motivation employees cannot perform their functions and feel frustrated. Thus, a smart leader would listen to his employees and encourage them because this would make them happy and be hard workers
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason which is worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study that was conducted on 120 leaders which showed that leaders who listen to others have 50% more chance of succeeding in their careers than their peers who do not listen to others. The study was conducted on leaders from different organizations to prevent anybias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reason, one soon realizes that leaders who listen to other gain more knowledge and are able not only to accomplish their tasks, but also create an environment where employees can thrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...s, leaders can enhance their knowledge. leaders who are open minded take the opportunit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...o the concerns of others a leader would no be able to accomplish his tasks properl...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees...
^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
... by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees. A...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to significant losses by the company. The second reason which deserves some at...
^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould make them happy and be hard workers Although the aforementioned reasons are ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0206185567 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68531470806 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502577319588 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7136590582 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.526315789 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24542762637 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082275149592 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652831703878 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141373069628 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062232802645 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.