Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every country has developed from various historical events, such as wars or revolutions, and then has become better and better. Also, these events are so important because they have many different influences on our society and nation. People can learn lots of experiences no matter positive or negative ones. From this point of view, I believe that all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. There are some reasons to support my opinion.
First, learning history can broaden the horizon and become well-informed. History has much to do with human life, especially historical building. Take my personal experiences as an example. When I traveled to the U.S, I went to visit the Statue of Liberty in New York, I was feeling extremely excited and inspired because I realize the historical meaning behind the statue. Once, I have taken the history course and learned America history. Hence, I knew the statue is a symbol of liberty and peace and it also represents the culture of America. On the contrary, if I had have not learned about history, I may regard Statue of Liberty as a normal statue.
Second, learning history is vital to avoid making the same mistakes twice. For instance, people were tended to live in nearby mountains due to natural resources which are the prerequisite condition to live. Ancient people were found that deforestation has some benefits. Initially, they take tree to exchange some goods they need, however, some merchants give some money to obtain these tree. Finally, they have to face some serious problem such as, the loss of soil and animal and floods submerge their living land. Learning from the story, people should not make the same mistake to destroy the earth land and we should protect the earth.
In short, although learning history is time-consuming, students should take it for granted that it is helpful to human life. Not only become wiser but also avoid making the same mistake twice. Due to these advantages, I consider that college students should study history course no matter what is their major subject is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ents are so important because they have many different influences on our society and nation. P...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... my personal experiences as an example. When I traveled to the U.S, I went to visit ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...as an example. When I traveled to the U.S, I went to visit the Statue of Liberty ...
^
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...e of America. On the contrary, if I had have not learned about history, I may regard...
^^^^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not learned about history, I may regard Statue of Liberty as a normal statue. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, for instance, in short, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99154929577 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50557640324 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574647887324 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5199155277 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.380952381 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929765618954 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268777864122 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221151179237 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564747096673 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00985582470298 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.