Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since the dawn of the civilization, people were trying to communicate with each other. I strongly agree that teachers should assign projects on which students must work together because they learn much more than when they are asked to work alone on projects. In what follows two conspicuous reasons will vindicate my standpoint.
To begin with, since teachers force the students work together, they learn team working. Consequently, they learn how to treat with each other, in addition to that, learning team working will help them how live as a human in society. I think my own experience is a compelling example for this. When I was a child, and I was in kindergarten, my pedagogue divided us in a group for christmas concert. When the time came during a christmas concert, we had a great performance. Since we worked together, we learn team working and also know how treat with each other which really help me live to as a member in a society.
Furthermore, of course there are some who argue that being in a team is just wasting your time because you cannot understand others problem to aid them to solve it. I feel this is a miss-guiding idea. Although students who are in team having a different problem, when they try to talk together and figure out what is their problem we can easily help them, So helping each other is another advantages of working in a team. When my uncle were in high school, his teacher give him an assignment. Since he was alone and do not having any friends or team to work with them, he could not solve his problem in that assignment, but if he had had a team, he could have easily solved that issue.
In conclusion, I subscribe to the idea that projects should have done by students together. This is because its helps them learn team working and also help each other to solve inexplicable problems.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Since the dawn of the civilization, peop...
^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
... the students work together, they learn team working. Consequently, they learn how t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...ch other, in addition to that, learning team working will help them how live as a hu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tmas concert. When the time came during a christmas concert, we had a great performance. Si...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...nce. Since we worked together, we learn team working and also know how treat with ea...
^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...r. This is because its helps them learn team working and also help each other to sol...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, really, so, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62385321101 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57518140311 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0685430941 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314905579317 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106826405144 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136954652278 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227921861093 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144988606266 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.