Most people in the world are interested to change their types of tasks in workday, which is more pleasurable and gives freshness. However, I think that only one type of task is better to do in the whole working days because it is more effective and more beneficial. There are several reasons why I feel this, which I will explore in the following reasons. To begin with, the working only one work in whole days is more lucrative and profitable from the perspective of money and efficiency. It is because it if I work in the whole day a single work then a complete task is completed fully. On the other hand, if I work in variety of work at the same time, the most tasks will be incomplete and ineffective, which is more frustrating and worthless. My personal experience is compelling example of this. Once upon a time, when I worked at a company, twelve hours a day, I got more money than my friends who did disparate jobs in three companies. This means they had earned less money in the compare of mine. Furthermore, the single but more insightful skill will be developed if only a single work is done. Due to compound effect; same thing but over and over again will be integrate and hence brings out large effect in the future, the person will be expertise and develops more significant skills. For instance, on comparing, a person, doing same job over long period of time and another person, doing variety of jobs, the person having single job becomes obviously more specialist and expert. In conclusion, I strongly feel that doing single job in a whole day is more satisfactory than doing variety of task in single day. This is because it is more effective and efficient and gives more skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1361, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing, a person, doing same job over long period of time and another person, doing variety of jo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58223684211 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56875461259 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5913783553 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21884614585 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808195326488 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623806218931 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21884614585 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.