There are different opinions on whether it is better for workers and laborers to do a single task during the day or they should be assorted and be able to do various duties. Though some people think that doing a sole task, or the other word being mono-task, helps workers to concentrate better and be more useful for the company, I believe otherwise, maintaining that it is necessary for workers to be multi-functional for the sake of their own satisfaction and company prosperity. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is versatility makes laborers perform better and more efficiently. Humans are not a machine; they need diversity during their days in both their lives and jobs. They need to switch between different tasks to help their brain rest and give it time to analyze the previous duty. Drawing from my own experience, when I study for an exam every two hours, I stop studying for my exam, consider it, for example, chemistry, and switch to another book, for instance, mathematics. Thereby, I give my brain some time to analyze and assort the brand-new information I have learned from chemistry. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that versatility helps workers perform better, and as a result, their self-satisfaction will increase.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some points here is that by doing different tasks, laborers become more experts in various fields. Take a power plant company as an example. A power plant company, just like other companies, has a team of technicians as well as a team of engineers. If an engineer of this company becomes familiar with working with machinery, in case of failure, he does not have to rely on a technician and can fix the fault by himself. Hence, he sees himself as more than a primary engineer since he can do theoretical calculations as well as practical tasks. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that being able to do various duties improves workers' satisfaction and skill.
All in all, many people are in favor of mono-task workers because they think in this way, workers can better focus on their given tasks. Nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that multi-functionality is necessary and beneficial for both companies and workers; this is because in this way, laborers perform more efficiently and they improve their skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06888361045 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93083919431 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527315914489 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1604051304 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.529411765 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237234818318 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073535712921 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637159368364 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143680817621 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427370614687 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.