Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is an intense debate over the issue of whether workers should have multiple tasks in their daily work. Some people hold the point that workers are satisfied with similar missions, while others have different opinions. As fas as I am concerned, it might be better for laborers to have different types of tasks in a day. My reasons are as follows.
Admittedly, focusing on a single task can help labors maintain high efficiency. No doubt, learning different tasks may cost works more time before they are evaluated as qualified. For example, FuShiKang, a well-known manufacture company that helps Apple assemble the iPhone and other products, always lets one worker do a single step in a division of labors process. By doing so, these workers can maintain their high efficiency, like assembling over thousands of cameras into iPhones or testing numerous Apple products in a day. Without question, allowing laborers to do a similar task is a way of retaining high efficiency.
However, we cannot deny the fact that performing single tasks in a day can lead to mental depression. As the example I mentioned above, according to a survey conducted by Peking University aiming to find out the mental health of FuShiKang, 80% of workers expressed they often experienced some depressions and anxieties in their daily life due to the high repetition of works. After all, it is human who performs the tasks every day instead of machines. No doubt, machines can finish the same tasks without complaints, but we should also pay attention to the mental health of a human being and ensure they can feel well being in their daily life.
Besides, according to recent research, people would increase their efficiency when conquering different tasks. As the information I mentioned above, laborers will be more efficient if they're familiar with the tasks. Nevertheless, based on research conducted by a laboratory in Taiwan, a human can also have a better performance if they have different tasks. The reason is that when processing different tasks, our brain is using different regions. For example, if a job requires more art inspiration, a certain brain that takes in charge of art will be more active. In this case, if doing different tasks, which are performed in a different area in our brain, we, labors, would not feel tired at all. In this case, we could increase our performance differently.
In sum, as the two reasons I present above, I strongly agree that workers would be more satisfied if they have multiple tasks in a day instead of a single task because different tasks will ensure our mental health and increasing our working efficiency.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ove, laborers will be more efficient if theyre familiar with the tasks. Nevertheless, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncrease our performance differently. In sum, as the two reasons I present above...
^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and increasing our working efficiency. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, after all, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01357466063 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71869525779 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4329761215 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.523809524 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304118834178 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913156419413 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517124611806 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177172145257 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399436776821 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.