Children nurturing has attracted much social concern. A minority of people believe that it is more difficult to educate children nowadays than in the past since cell phones, online games and social networking Web sites take them so much time. Personally, I bear in mind a strong disagreement with this belief.
On the one hand, the change of the world draws much of my attention. The fact is that the advancement of the world creates chances for the internet to dramatically develope. Therefore, it is inclined to contain a vast source of information on every subject and become more accessible. As a result, it is possible for teachers and parents nowadays to effortlessly obtain any sort of knowledge only by typing a keyword on the computer, instead of spending hours looking for relevant books or documents as before, and use them as supports in educating their children. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in proving the fact that the movement of the world brings about easier ways of educating children. More importantly, it cannot be denied that the fast-paced changing of the world possesses a large probability for the advancement of technologies in connecting people. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for parents to have better interactions and improve mutual communication with their children. On that ground, needless to say, parents are bound to get closer and be more involved in their children's education. Subsequently, they are certain to obtain easier ways of guiding the children on their academic paths. By and large, it is highly likely that the movement of the world actually brings many benefits for teachers and parents to educate their children.
On the other hand, some people might say that many kinds of entertainment on modern devices are so attractive and time-consuming for children. Accordingly, it is extremely more difficult to teach them. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that parents always can set the rules for children to use technological devices. It follows that children have to obey and this greatly helps them schedule their time effectively and put everything under control. Furthermore, there are varied types of recreational activities on modern devices, thus they stand a golden chance for children to attain more options for relaxing after hard-working times. In this case, it is expected to encourage them to fully refresh themselves and be filled with satisfactory feelings. Correspondingly, children have a tendency to acquire creative minds and be able to generate outstanding ideas in studying. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to their efficiency in studying and acknowledging lessons from others. Subsequently, it is easier for teachers and parents to educate their children. Beyond any doubt, the idea that technological devices make the children educating more extremely arduous is often possible to end in collapse.
In a nutshell, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my disagreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to have a better understanding of the effects of the development of the world on children's education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, sort of, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2715.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27184466019 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05742568576 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51067961165 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.106282109 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.423076923 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8076923077 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19003946843 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053868592963 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677339877954 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140684316148 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118284194352 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.