Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, the way you work plays an important role in the outcome of your work. Regarding this issue, a controversial subject arises as to whether it is of more importance to work slowly in order to be sure that everything is alright or to work very fast and risk making mistakes. As a teaching assistant, I prefer to work slowly without making mistakes and I back up my claim by providing two reasons from my own perspective.
In the first place, in fact, although it may not be mutually acceptable for every kind of job, in some kinds of jobs the accuracy of the job is critically essential. For instance, imagine a person working with radioactive materials in a nuclear station. Provided that he makes a tiny mistake while operating the sophisticated machines in the station, there might happen such a disaster that may wreak havoc on the whole country. As a result, depending on the job, the accuracy of the work is urgent when it comes to avoiding such a potential chaos.
Additionally, from an overall view, working slowly at times results to time-saving. When you work at a slow speed, you have the opportunity to do the job as perfect as possible. For example, once as a teaching assistant, I sometimes assisted my professor with industrial projects in which I had to program a code on the computer-aided devices. I always spent a lot of time to code in an organized, neat way so that anyone including my professor and the relevant industrial company's engineers could understand the code so easily. However, had I coded so quick without any organized way, it would have taken the engineers so much more to grasp the procedure inside my codes and in turn, there would have been a great loss of time overall.
In brief, each of the aforementioned reasons points to the conclusion that working in a slow pace while accomplishing the job perfectly is of more advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...s issue, a controversial subject arises as to whether it is of more importance to work slowly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, regarding, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in brief, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the whole, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88176692444 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9335162052 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 5.45110844103 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241319266721 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903068270411 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767830669193 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149097418762 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109785855613 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.