There have appeared endless discussions over learning content of students. Some educators suggest that it is of great necessity for learners to acquire knowledge of ideas and concepts rather than facts. Personally, I completely approve of this suggestion.
First of all, what takes my priority is study efficiency. It is widely known that apprehension of theories and concepts means that students profoundly comprehend the nature and the actual mechanism of the matter pondered. For this reason, students are likely to discern how facts are created scientifically. Therefore, it is possible for them to quickly understand facts and possess in-depth knowledge. This results in significant advancement in their academic career. More notably, penetrating ideas and concepts brings learners opportunities to grasp a comprehensive view of the matter and realize how facts which are sustained by the same concepts own connection with each other. Because of this, students are capable of deducing how other similar facts take place and easily understand a broad range of facts. Hence, it will be more simple for them to memorize knowledge by learning concepts in lieu of a great number of specific facts. Consequently, students are able to make much progress in their study. With no doubt, it is advisable for learners to understand theories and concepts to significantly enhance their study efficiency.
In the second place, skills development is what cannot be left out when considering the essence. It is well noted that due to the complication of studying concepts and ideas, students have the demand of asking their professors for clarifying the ambiguity. These teachers are different from them in many aspects such as age, personality, and background. Thus, students have to learn how to communicate in harmony with their professors. If this occurs, then there is likelihood for them to considerably promote communications skill. More interestingly, delving deeply into concepts and theories requires much endeavor and time of learners. Accordingly, becoming busier is inevitable for them. Therefore, only by more effectively scheduling timetable, are students capable of balancing numerous duties. To this end, their time management skill will be definitely practiced and ameliorated. Without doubt, the best way for learners to better various skills is to study concepts and ideas.
In a word, the increase in study efficiency and improvement in personal skills are convincing reasons for my approval of the suggestion. It is highly recommended that educators should take my writing into great consideration to make appropriate decisions on learning content in schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, no doubt, such as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52997601918 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04334971181 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8696979702 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.24 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.68 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293456503341 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782857707058 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617247975478 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167118253678 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678685099535 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.