Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is wrong to judge people before getting to know them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your response.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is wrong to judge people before getting to know them.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your response.

We all, in our life, have had some friends whom we have created very close relationships with. have our attitudes towards them been the same before and after getting to know them? In my opinion, an attitude to each one will alter after recognizing accurately. In this essay, I will elaborate on why I feel that it is wrong to give your verdict about people before enough recognition.

Firstly, the cardinal factor of judging farnkly is perceiving of different aspects of each one. each one has unique character, individual interests, different concern and even distinct purposes, in addition, may come from a famaily different from yours. due to that fact, we need to know all these issues for judging precisely, so it requires time. as the saying goes time is a great judge, therefore, judging takes a period of time to be honest and frank. My own experience is a good example of this. In early, when I went to high school, I did not know almost most of my classmates. Some day, I was in urgent need of some money and I decided to ask one of my classmates, whom I had recently made friend with, to give this amount of money to solve my problem. When I told him about my problem, he scoffed at me and denied lending this money to me. After this advanture, I was irate at him so that I intended to never speak with him. The days passed till he was not present at school for a week when I inquire after him, I knew that he had had to work for earning his required money because his family was needy and from working-class, therefore, I understood why he lent money to me. This example clearly demonstrates that itis wrong to criticize people before gaining enough information about them.

Additionally, judging people should be ethical and moral since judgement without recognitionbring about destroying our reputation and personality. We all, for the first time, when face unknown people, have a shortage of recognition about them, for this reason, if we form our view about them immediately and indiscriminately, it may cause harmful effects on our prestige. For instance, one of its effects will be infamousness since our untrue judgement will ruin and change people’s feedback and attitudes towards us, in addition, destroys the human relationships and bonds. Due to that fact, other people will not trust us and will think we are duplicity persons, therefore, we will become secluded and nervous. On the other hand, judging people based on honest recongnition brings about close relationships between people and increase of our respects.What’s more, it may affect people whom we judge since it is possible that other people behave them according to our judgement and statements. To put it briefly, our unfair statements may be hazard for their reputation, their respect and even their family. For another example, when I was in high school, I had a classmate, named Zaza, who frequently criticized and judged the abilities of one of my classmates, Asad. In early, I did not have enough information about Asad and his abilities because I had freely gone to that school. Zaza had impacted on my attitude to Asad and Ihad thought that Asad was a lier because Asad was telling about high abilities in calculus and physics, nonetheless most of us were not believing. Finally, contrary to Zaza’s statement, me andthe others knew that Asad not only was not a lier but also had outstanding ability in calculus and physics and his scores had proved it. As a consequence, it is fair to judge people after geeting to know them.

To wrap it up, I strongly think that it is wrong and unfair to criticize people before obtaining enough data about them. Since recognition of different facets of people is a fundemental element of jugding. Furthermore, judgment had better honest and ethical because of its harmful effects onpeople’s attitude, their feedback and our relationships.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Have
... created very close relationships with. have our attitudes towards them been the sam...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Each
...iving of different aspects of each one. each one has unique character, individual in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...me from a famaily different from yours. due to that fact, we need to know all these...
^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...judging precisely, so it requires time. as the saying goes time is a great judge, ...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...great judge, therefore, judging takes a period of time to be honest and frank. My own experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 859, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What&apos
...een people and increase of our respects.What's more, it may affect people whom we ju...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1569, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lus and physics, nonetheless most of us were not believing. Finally, contrary to Zaza's state...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...efore obtaining enough data about them. Since recognition of different facets of peop...
^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'briefly', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'i feel', 'in addition', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.193166885677 0.229887763892 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.161629434954 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788436268068 0.0866891130778 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446780551905 0.046263068375 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.115637319317 0.0685040099705 169% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.122207621551 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.042049934297 0.0351676179071 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8674155742 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328515111695 0.0309702414327 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00131406044678 0.00188951952338 70% => OK
Determiners: 0.0525624178712 0.0887237588012 59% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0157687253614 0.0209618222197 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144546649146 0.0139019557991 104% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3894.0 2387.08602151 163% => OK
No of words: 663.0 408.028673835 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87330316742 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07432619952 4.48200974243 113% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334841628959 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244343891403 0.251872472559 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164404223228 0.174417080927 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116138763198 0.112833075102 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8674155742 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 310.0 212.727598566 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467571644042 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.7106364517 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6684587814 140% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8620689655 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8003156863 48.84282405 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.275862069 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8620689655 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.586206896552 0.644075263715 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.54480286738 144% => OK
Readability: 47.2964581058 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.11020408163 1.45489161554 76% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31098249195 0.300154397459 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136532094908 0.103427244359 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0877904581204 0.0752933317313 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.419687617299 0.497263757937 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.096149425102 0.151897553556 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116993063753 0.114077575197 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868965300521 0.0781384742642 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.38607903396 0.336927656856 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0754385722887 0.067059652881 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237403851952 0.210909579961 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015005640181 0.0618886996521 24% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.4623655914 284% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.