Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without the shadow of doubt, leaders are not normal people and they mostly belong to an elite group of society. These people have played a predominant role throught the history and form rise and fall of societies. We have good leaders and bad leaders like Mahatma Gandi and Kim. As some people may belive to be a leader one only should put lots of effort to it others might think vice versa. As far as I am concidered, Being a leader needs more intrinsics features and is more of a natural attribute. In the following I will delve into the most conpicuous reasons wich persuaded me to put forward this idea.
First and foremost, Leaders should be mentally prepared to become one because they need to be charismatic and ifluential to persuade others to follow them. So it is a natural attribute of a person. An example can account for my point. We all are agreed that Hitler was a dictator but at the same time he was the one who made German people to become one and follow him. The way he used to behave no one could say no to him and most of people of the country belived him even he was telling lies. The influence of his behaivior and his speeches made mothers to send their children to war willingly only to advocate Hitler. A large porpotion of the country were his adherents at the begining of his leadership since he was influential. This kind of characteristic is natural in some people.
Another point one should take to account this significant is, Leaders are busy people and should be able to handle predicaments which some times results in not being able to spend time with their family. So a leader should be able to live with no family which is hard for most of the people. Only a few people are able to do so and as a result I consider it as an inherent feature. An instance of this is Mahatma Gandi who founded the indian revolution against English government. He spend most of his time in prison away from his family, around fourty years of his life, and when he was out and won the battle agains the Status quo he had no time to spend with his family only in order to be able to attend a lot of meetings. So being alone and with no family requiers an intrinsic charecter.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples shows that to be a leader you need to live with no family and behave influntially. So I conclude that to be a leader one should have different natural features.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bad leaders like Mahatma Gandi and Kim. As some people may belive to be a leader o...
^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...o behave no one could say no to him and most of people of the country belived him even he was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...volution against English government. He spend most of his time in prison away from hi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42058165548 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46285458327 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487695749441 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.792531143 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04545454545 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182818883544 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573818057366 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489464998618 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134522096647 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459141950968 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.