Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses strange sounds that were like frog croaks and russian submarines used to hear the during the period from 1960s untill 1980s. Because of the frog like croaks, russian called them "quackers" which was like it was moving very nimble while sonars were disable to detect the source. the author states some likely sources for the sound. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that the source of the sound might had been orca whales during their courtship rituals since they make some noises to call out each other. However, the lecturer explains that this idea seems not convincing because orac whales live near the surface of the water while the submarine is deep in the water so it makes impossible for people to hear their sound. Also she mentiones that sonars are enable to detect them but the source of the sound could not be found on the sonar of these sub marines.
Second, the writer proclaims that another possibility for the source of the sound is giant squids, some large animal that inhabit deep in the water and has a soft body with no skeleton which explains why they could not be detected by the sonars. Yet again, the speaker underscores that the sounds were heared only between 1960s and 1980s but giant squads lived before 1960s and after 1980s. This fact contradicts the point that giant squids do live today but no sound can be heared anymore.
The last point of contention between the reading and listening passages is the exictance of some sort of military technology. The author thinks that another country's submarine which were secretly patroling the area wa the source of the sound. On the other hand, the speaker explains that a submarine can not move as fast as the source of the sound. Also she points out that the submarines make engine sound and they are detectable on sonars because untill now we do not have the technology to make smooth engines and staying hidden from sonars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disabled'.
Suggestion: disabled
...as moving very nimble while sonars were disable to detect the source. the author states...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nars were disable to detect the source. the author states some likely sources for t...
^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ossible for people to hear their sound. Also she mentiones that sonars are enable to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...und. Also she mentiones that sonars are enable to detect them but the source of the so...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ove as fast as the source of the sound. Also she points out that the submarines make...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, well, while, as to, sort of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81690140845 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28670289217 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1596075752 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162541708792 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573919852027 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536894504362 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10296656992 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278924867617 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.