Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Knowing about the history is an essential part of humans as it builds up their personality and defines who they are. By looking at the history it is fascinating to how humans have changed since stone age and became leaders among all creatures. Knowing about the history is really important and as a result I think it is essential to learn about it no matter the field of study. In the following I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples which persuaded me to put forward this idea.

First and foremost, it prevents repitition of mistakes of the past as student can learn about consequences of decisions which were made in the past. By avoiding these mistakes even individuals can devote them selves to prosperity of a country and elevates their life standards. As an example, during industrialization period in Great Britain a huge amount of pollutants contamined waters and were emissioned to air which led to the dirty city of London but now london is the most green city in the world. The reason for this is in a time people of the city decided to clean up their town and they did so but also they tought the history of that period to their children too which is continuing up to today. Those children became governers but they did not forget the outcome of industrilization because they were told about their history. So they kept the town in the track and still they have the most clean city only because they know about their history and the consequences of wrong decisions.

Another point to account this significant is that history provides a viriety of ideas which were used in ancient time but can also be the basis for new inventions. New inventions can solve most of todays challenges but without knowing past technology it might take a lot more to find an idea. An instance of this is an old public bath in Iran which is now a museum. This bath has a particular feature which makes it exceptional which is a candle alone boils the water and also ventilate the bath. This technology was used around five hundred years ago in Iran and not only it is surprising but also it can help to solve todays energy crisis. So knowing about the history can give ideas to solve modern problems.

To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples advocate the fact that learning about history is important for every one since it can reduce mistakes by learning from the past and giving people ideas to solve problems.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
...se mistakes even individuals can devote them selves to prosperity of a country and elevates...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the todays') or simply say ''most todays''.
Suggestion: most of the todays; most todays
...ew inventions. New inventions can solve most of todays challenges but without knowing past tec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, so, still, as to, i think, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66743648961 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56886235738 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478060046189 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3580879226 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.882352941 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101395285699 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366212864528 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296867764481 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072942419373 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376580204211 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.