Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses, no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History, an extremely interesting and mysterious subject, is often considered a class that all university students should take. But in my own opinion, I would suggest that universities should allow students to choose whether to take history classes or not and also give students some advice instead of forcing them to choose.
The first thing to note is that if a student's main field of study is geology or literature, it is absolutely beneficial to study history and spend some time in a history class. If students do not choose to study history, it is difficult for them to understand some professional terminology in geology or literature, and it is also difficult for them to understand when or why this terminology was invented and used. Such as some historical background in satirical literature. Due to this situation, students who choose geology and literature will soon discover that if they do not choose history class, it is difficult for them to keep up with school work. It will end up with these students studying history themselves instead of a doctrinaire requirement.
Secondly, it is also fine if a student does not choose history. Such as students interested in computer science or chemistry. It is helpful for them to study some historical events that are related to their main course. However, the university should not force them to take history classes. For example, on a final exam in chemistry, the question will be "How to identify Helium?" rather than "Who was the leader of the Brazilian revolution?" And also, if a student is studying computer science, the first thing they will be asked when they come to Google or Facebook is, "What program and application did you code?" or "What is the function of 'printing' in Python?" but it will certainly not be, "When was the first American mideast railway built?" Therefore, for these kinds of students, if they refuse to study history class, it is reliable and reasonable. The university cannot interfere with the personal preferences of these students who are interested in science.
In conclusion, universities can encourage students to take history classes, especially those interested in literature and geology. But for those students who are interested in subjects that are not directly related to history, the university has no right to force them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
.... The first thing to note is that if a students main field of study is geology or liter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21354166667 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01870884346 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.521267553 48.9658058833 273% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214712737571 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885801943361 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447437462874 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143473848449 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177614442109 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.