Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Since compared with the advertisements in the past, advertisements nowadays are less honest, so they are not useful for customers as they make a decision to buy.
Today, advertising has become one of the key means of promoting a product in all businesses. It's not surprising that some people believe that as business competition heats up, companies will do whatever they can to attract customers, and that one of the most important means of promoting their products -- advertising -- is no longer as honest as it once was. However, in my opinion, not only has advertising not become dishonest, but it has also become more honest than before.
First of all, it is true that there is harsh and drastic competition in the market today, but it is not very likely that a company will give up its product quality and everything else and go for such a scheme as falsification because of "competition." There are better ways and methods for companies to improve their competitiveness than using dishonest advertising, such as making their products more appealing to consumers. In fact, the use of dishonest advertising actually makes the company less competitive. Dishonest advertising means that a company's products are not actually of the quality advertised, which leads consumers to stop choosing the company's products in favor of companies that use truthful and honest advertising. I am confident that no company would go to the trouble of creating a deceptive advertisement and risk losing all of its customers.
Secondly, the scrutiny and revaluation of advertising have become more stringent. Today, consumers can shop online, and numerous software programs offer this service, such as Amazon or eBay. In this software, there is a review section for a specific product. Users can assess whether the product is good or bad, beneficial or flawed, in the review section. So if a company exaggerates its product with ads that create a sense of deception among consumers, then no one will buy it. Let's say I want to buy headphones. Many different companies have run eye-catching ads touting the benefits of their headphones. In the past, before the advent of these review sections and online shopping methods, I might have been misled by a dishonest headphone ad. But now, if I do not know which headphones are best for me, I can go to the review section and check out the reviews. If I hear that the headphones are not as good as advertised, I will not buy them. Not only do consumers supervise ads, but many departments in government are now managing them as well. For example, the data on the advertisement must have a source or citation, and the content on the advertisement cannot contain overly promotional sentences and words. Therefore, companies must use honest advertising and promotions to gain additional profits and attract more consumers. Otherwise, the company will end up losing customers or being sanctioned by the government and the law.
In conclusion, today's companies are not inclined to choose dishonest advertising, which is a highly risky means of propagandizing, in order to ensure their competitiveness, ensure that their customers will not lose, and ensure their own interests. On the contrary, because of stricter censorship, companies' advertisements are becoming more honest, authentic, and believable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ong consumers, then no one will buy it. Lets say I want to buy headphones. Many diff...
^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'Many'.
Suggestion: Many
... it. Lets say I want to buy headphones. Many different companies have run eye-catching ads tou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2665.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17475728155 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13742496049 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483495145631 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4717615224 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.869565217 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73913043478 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184662588968 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582975307283 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438488737138 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111312207677 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347953195295 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.