Based on the given materials, the article as well as the reading discusses colonization on asteroids. The author states that asteroids have several options which makes them agood place to do so. The lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, it is alleged in the reading landing on and taking off from an asteroid is easier due to their low weight and gravity so it will be safer for people and inreases the possibility of carrying more supply. However, the lecturer asserts that the lower gravity can cause serious health issues for people in the colony. He alludes to astronautes who suffer from muscle mass loses and bone density reduction. Staying long in low gravity environment can cause svere damage to people. Consequently Low gravity has its own doen sides.
Second, the author proclaims that asteroids contain some rare materials and mining them can yield good profit. Yet again, the lecturer underscores that not only the cost to support the colony on an asteroid is high but also transporting the mined materials is expensive. Also there is no certainity in the price of this material as if their production expand their price will decline. Mined material is not a good source to support the colony.
The last point of contention between the reading and the listening passages is the asteroids accessability. The writer states that reaching an asteroid is easy since some times they orbit close to earth. On the other hand, The speaker mentions that albeit reaching them is easier but returning from them can be highly challenging since their route is not a circle. When an asteroid passes close to the earth, it moves away even further than moon or mars which makes it relatively far away to earth. So commuting to an asteroid is not possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...nment can cause svere damage to people. Consequently Low gravity has its own doen sides. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rting the mined materials is expensive. Also there is no certainity in the price of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, well, as to, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53726652876 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9195755501 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7058823529 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897917055861 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298815440791 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030413437148 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524388211403 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257546650091 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.