In today's fast-paced society, people have become occupied with immense tasks at work and at home, which is a widely-accepted reason to explain why people accomplish so few things properly. From my perspective, I comprehensively assent with this outlook.
Admittedly, if people actively multitask, they will be distracted such that they are unable to concentrate or perform their best on every activity. As a result, nothing is viable, especially evident if the jobs are not interlinked. Take me as an emblematic example, in the covid-19 pandemic, when I got stuck at home with the isolation, I tried to learn 5 languages in 3 months. However, I expeditiously fell into complications of the dispute of 5 languages. Therefore, I recognized that everything I had learned in each topic had been for naught. After that, I began to concentrate on improving English and learning elemental Chinese at a time, giving it my undivided attention and efforts.
Furthermore, multitasking implies that people have difficulty in time management. Fair timing plays a vital role in the schedule of individuals. It reflects what type of person is and how they deal with their assigned tasks. People often spend the most time on recreation or do nothing and get stressed when doing a load of work on D-day. Instead, they need a perfect agenda with detailed tasks and do this earnestly. Moreover, people are constantly weary and do not fulfill their goals. In turn, this will negatively influence them and can lead to sadness and failure.
In conclusion, making the schedule in a smart way helps people be successful and healthier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h topic had been for naught. After that, I began to concentrate on improving Engl...
^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...re. In conclusion, making the schedule in a smart way helps people be successful and healthie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 265.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09056603774 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06211011133 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652830188679 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7717918722 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3125 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189593085196 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511762214493 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593274247764 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976732394305 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681849106087 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.