Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The change of social status of teachers has been a popular topic, and in my opinion, I strongly agree with the statement that teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past comparing to teachers nowadays with two reasons.

To begin with, nowadays, students have multiple learning sources which means that they no longer need to rely solely on teachers speaking of education; therefore, the importance of teachers decreases. Take university students in Taiwan for example. In the past, school was the only learning channel for Taiwanese university students so they needed to pay full attention to what teachers delivered, which makes teachers rather valuable at that time. However, with the high Internet usage rate in Taiwan, university students nowadays can easily access some other learning channels on the Internet, such as Cousera, MOOC, or edX. In this way, they don't need to be so attentive to what teachers teach at school, since there are so many alternatives to learn other than school. Therefore, this results in the increasingly low attendance rate of universities courses, showing that students today care much less about university teachers and education comparing to the past.

Furthermore, in the past, education resource was very unique and could only be accessed by people who came from families which were either wealthy or with high social status, and only those who received high quality education could become teachers. This made the whole society considered teachers as a symbol of people with a respectable background, and therefore led to their high social status. Nonetheless, nowadays, in most countries, general education is required to every student, which means everyone can receive general degree of education, letting education resource no longer be limited to only a specific group of people. Therefore, it widens the background of teachers, making teachers no longer the symbol of high classes. Take Taiwan for an example. In the 1950s, there were only twenty percent of students got accepted by colleges, which was the requirement of being a junior high school teacher. Consequently, if someone could be a high school teacher at that time, he or she was sure to be outstanding since he or she outperformed eighty percent of students. However, nowadays, there is a nearly hundred percent of college acceptance rate in Taiwan since there are too many universities but a decreasing amount of students, making almost every student with a college degree. In this case, almost every student in Taiwan meets the requirement of a junior high school teacher, making the scarcity of teachers no longer exist. Therefore, the society would only consider teachers as a normal career and won't give special appreciation to teachers as they used to.

In a conclusion, based on the two reasons above, I strongly agree with the statement that teachers nowadays are not that appreciated and valued by the society comparing to the past.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ousera, MOOC, or edX. In this way, they dont need to be so attentive to what teacher...
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...are so many alternatives to learn other than school. Therefore, this results in the ...
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique, in the past, education resource was very unique and could only be accessed by people wh...
Line 5, column 1114, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...s. However, nowadays, there is a nearly hundred percent of college acceptance rate in T...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, speaking of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2502.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2125 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72455080396 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485416666667 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2621295601 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220688397375 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798790004401 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856532518589 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207271791787 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957715296036 0.0645574589148 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.