Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific detail and examples to support your answer.
After advent of technology in the recent centuries, the way that dwellers of this world lived in the past, changes, significantly. Some people believe that by appearance of technological devices, children have been getting less creative and they are losing their innovation. While, others hold the opposite point of view and declare that recent generation by using lucrative benefits of technology are improving their quality of life and their ingenuity increase, impressively. From my perspective, the latter point of view is true. In order to justify my opinion, two of the most conspicuous of my reasons will be explored in the following essay.
First of all, one of the most remarkable proofs of this assertion is related to this importance that technology not only does not close the chance of being creative for children but also, effectively help them in various paths. In other words, at the early age of each individual, children are less patient and may be the same way of education does not work for all of them. Besides, technological devices in new era will be able to easily contribute parents and teachers of children in order to find new methods. So, in this way, children are capable of choosing their own style which eventually let them fortify and raise the feature of improvisation. So, if technology is used in the correct ways, it will be helpful for children.
Second and equally exquisite point is about this issue that since technology opens new door and provide a way for connecting children from different location of the world to each other, it could be helpful for children to communicate with each other and it will have more positive consequences on their level of creativity. To shed more light on this matter, consider a situation in which there are two children on two diverse schools. If one of them educate in a very precious school where the authorities of the school utilize new kind of methods, it will be feasible for them for sharing their information, which could dramatically raise their conception and creativity.
All in all, regarding the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that if technology is used in a righteous way, it will have very huge impact in the level of creativity of children in several ways. Not only it helps parents and teachers for finding best entertaining way of education which has lucrative effects for ingenuity of children, but also it will a significant way of communication for sharing their information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a righteous way" with adverb for "righteous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e conclusion that if technology is used in a righteous way, it will have very huge impact in the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nication for sharing their information.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, while, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99520383693 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87374628773 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496402877698 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0929430183 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.866666667 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111442357832 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470050916854 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364193692622 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765447915932 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256694337996 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.