Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without the shadow of doubt, professors have always played a crucial role in the quality of the education in a university since they are the core elements who have interaction with student. but personally I disagree with the statement. In the following, I will delve into most convicing reasons which made me to put forward the idea that increasing professor's income does not nessarly leads to a higher quality education.
First and foremost, universities can invest their budget in the main source of the higher education which is its students. Students are those who define the quality of the education of where they study. Having a good condition to study for students results in higher quality research output because the more comfortable the student the better he can focus. For example, I have a friend whose name is Billy and he lives in Iran while studying in the best university of the country. The university pays him a salary which is enough for him to provide his nessary commodities for a basic life and consequently he is always studying and is one of the brightest researchers I have ever seen since he does not have to worry about working to make money.
Second, a university can use the budget at its disposal to buy better equipment for its labs. Experiments is an essential part of the sudy for students to understand a concept so having more sophisticated and modern equipment lets professors to perform more complex experiments. An instance of this claim is more tangible by one of my personal experience. In my university labs are really up to date and the best equipment are always within the reach of students. In one of my courses I could not understand how does an earthquack affect a buliding foundation but since we had the equipment to simulate such a phenomena we were able to observe the real impact and as result I was able to understand the concept perfectly.
Last but not the least, Is that mostly professors have other source of income too so they might not need the extra money provided by the university and as a result the investment of the university wastes. An example of this situation is my own advisor who owns one of the biggest companies in my country and whenever I talk to him he states that he does not teach for the salary of the university but only because he love teaching.
To wrap t up, all aforementioned reasons and examples convinced me that university can spend thier budget on better subjects than just increasing professors income because providing student with a suitable enviroment to study and buying equipments play their own role in asurring a higher quality education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ents who have interaction with student. but personally I disagree with the statemen...
^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...to put forward the idea that increasing professors income does not nessarly leads to a hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 609, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a phenomenon' or simply 'phenomena'?
Suggestion: a phenomenon; phenomena
...e we had the equipment to simulate such a phenomena we were able to observe the real impact...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 418, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loves'.
Suggestion: loves
...y of the university but only because he love teaching. To wrap t up, all aforem...
^^^^
Line 17, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...on better subjects than just increasing professors income because providing student with a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, really, second, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82236842105 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75809111478 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484649122807 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8198556877 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.4375 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210459564536 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776241541437 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429481456512 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128041625812 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252386891981 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.