Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
In these days there has been much controversy about proficient tactics of studying and learning educational materials and carryout the projects in a productive way and caused quite a stir in numerous circles and camps. Different people may give various types of response to this question based upon their cultural, familiar and their background. although majority of people contemplate that working on project individually triggers tangible outcomes in order to devoid of difficulties of working with miscellaneous students, other posits that working together brings about variant advantage that outweigh these drawbacks .however when it comes to me I conspicuously declare that students benefit from group work not only in their educational prosperity but also their future life on account of the following reasons
.
To begin with, it is a common phenomenon that social skills are more than fundamental factors to bring the people significant achievement in the society. I would like to mention more progress in working in group in order to augmenting their social skills such as taking responsibility and their communication skills which have a profound impression on their family life and in their workplace. This means, by knowing the notion that goofing off your share task would have a adverse impact on the performance of whole group, you gradually learn to take on responsibility and appropriate deal with other member of the team. In addition you learn how to interact with other people when you are under pressure.
Second, studying by ourselves in long hours is inherently boredom under most circumstances. There are diverse fields of studies and assignments that we are not really interested in such as solving a statistical math problems, … and you might get distracted and lose your concentration after long time and get tired. Another way to put it is, if you work in group, other members likely motivate you persistently and justifying you not to abandon your effort and keep on studying hard. Working in a group is a best way to keep yourself stimulus and passionate.
Last but not least, a precise assessment in this realm demonstrates students are confronted with variety of difficulties in their project such as memorizing some hypothesis or running a device in the laboratory or synthesis precarious chemical substances. If you cooperate in team, gifted students in your team assist you to address the problem as soon as possible. Moreover, it would boost your understanding and knowledge and intensify your performance since many innovative opinions are coming up in your mind by sharing different alternatives. A brief investigation reveals that overcoming drawback and troubles by a individuals would waste a lot of your time and energy.
To put it in a nutshell, I restate that a growing body of evidence reinforces that profits of working in a team outweigh its weaknesses. Back to beginning controversial question I restate that working in a group not only promote your research projects speed as well but also developing your social capacities and broadening your mind and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nal materials and carryout the projects in a productive way and caused quite a stir in numerous cir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ultural, familiar and their background. although majority of people contemplate that wor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... advantage that outweigh these drawbacks .however when it comes to me I conspicuou...
^^
Line 1, column 817, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ife on account of the following reasons . To begin with, it is a common phenomen...
^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... goofing off your share task would have a adverse impact on the performance of wh...
^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... deal with other member of the team. In addition you learn how to interact with other pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...on studying hard. Working in a group is a best way to keep yourself stimulus and ...
^
Line 7, column 620, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat overcoming drawback and troubles by a individuals would waste a lot of your t...
^
Line 7, column 620, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: a individual; individuals
...hat overcoming drawback and troubles by a individuals would waste a lot of your time and ener...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, well, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2629.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26853707415 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00211858527 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541082164329 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.6871089715 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.647058824 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3529411765 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210294823165 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635208919325 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541055651356 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109903294186 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410825962107 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.