Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp

Nowadays, there is no doubt that an accurate and adequate learning method plays a critical role in people's life, especially among academic students. But the controversial point is whether team work learning like assigning projects on which students must work together is better, or learing by the method that obligates students to work solitaryly. Although some people have the tendency to believe in the latter one, I believe in the former, and I think in comparison with the adverse effect, the impact students more in possetive ways. Accordingly, in what follows, I will try to provide some cogent reasons to support my statement.

First and foremost, it is established beyond the doubt that students can learn from each other and check their mistakes during team work projects. Sometimes students are not focused enough in the class and leran with a lot of blunders when the teacher instructs. As a case in point, two years ago, when I was a bachelor student, I had a course that I could not learn, thoroughly what my professor said during the class due to being unaccustomed to early morning classes. So, when he desided to evaluate students' ability at the end of the term by an exam, It was frightening for me, and apparently, I got a point under 10. But, as he was so kind, he told me you can work on a project with one of the other feeble students in my class. If you get along with together and do the project as well as an innovative student I will give you an appropriate point that will not dwindle your average. As a result, We worked on the same project and during that we learned from each other, so as we got a 17 at the end of the term, and now, my partner is the professor's research assistant. Had not we worked in a group on the same project, we would not have flousrished till now.

The other equally important point is that when they work on projects with their classmates in a group they can utter what they have learnd, and this would help them to review thier previous lesson that their teacher taught them. Moreover, their knowledge could be examined during the mentioned team work. As a case in piont, two weeks ago, my brother and I decided to involve a GRE course as we are going to take this exam three months later. We managed our schedule to study together after the class and during the studying, he comprehended a mathematical method of a test after he explained it for me. However, before our study both of us had the same problem, but after expressing that by himself, he learned it for the best and the lesson got stuck in his mind. If he did not restate that lesson for me, he would not have solved the related test.

For the matter of conclusion, I think it is now clear why a learning method like working in a group on the same project by students would be more effective than working alone on projects. Although it was just a story in a nutshell, and definitely, there are more reasoms supporting that, but, for the matter of brevity, I think the mentioned reasons are enough. In the end, according to the momentous role of team work learning method in shaping students' knowledge, I recommend that elementry teachers exploit this method because it is more favorably effective than using this method later.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...ial point is whether team work learning like assigning projects on which students mu...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, i think, no doubt, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2672.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 583.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58319039451 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53126753414 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466552315609 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6740272136 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.238095238 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7619047619 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322760600991 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958211919803 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787534312154 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201351277247 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618254776917 0.0645574589148 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.