Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that today' world complexity poses several variation in people’ lifestyle from that of past. Helping to community is of paramount importance for thriving our country. This brings up a controversial question: Do teenagers and young adults give enough time for helping their city dwellers? Some people are inclined toward the stance that young subject are spend reasonable time for supporting their community, whereas others oppose. In my perspective, I think that it is a true fact that current posterity give little time for developing their own communities.
To begin with, young people spend most of their time for studying. In fact, nowadays juveniles dedicate half of day going to school and extending their knowledge. They work on project with their friends and study with them for final test. After adults grow older, they register to a college in order to gain a university degree. Not only that, but also these individuals after school time, stay at home or go to the library for the sake of performing class assignment. However, the past posterity was not like this, they do not intend to obtain academic education, instead, they tried to clean streets from garbage and trash. Past generation in their adulthood spend time during a week for identifying issues surrounding people' life including people who had problems related to economic and so forth. Hence, young subjects do not give sufficient time for preserving their community because of studying.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that new generation do not care about their communities and rather consume their time in leisure activities. Indeed, adults do not interact with their neighbor’s children. When one of neighbors get chronicle diseases, juveniles do not visit them or do not provide assistance such as financial and sentimental aids, while people in the past not only aware from their neighbors health, but also they attempted to supply their essential requirements such as money for them. Moreover, in the last decades subjects used to give heed to preserve a good environment by cleansing dust and dirt from the streets. All of these activities, however, are forgotten and adult merely heed to their own life by going to cinema or attending in the live concert in their spare times.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factors, I contend that young people do not dedicate enough time to helping community improve because these individuals' times is allocated to education as well as leisure time and because they do not care issues surrounding their community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...oward the stance that young subject are spend reasonable time for supporting their co...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for developing their own communities. To begin with, young people spend most o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are issues surrounding their community.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19952494062 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76312685842 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553444180523 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8787251145 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.210526316 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280723634233 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971927083185 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673115656683 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196878051431 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212658419166 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.