Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Technology decrease children creativity. Give your reasons.
The advancement in technology has eased our lives from improving our living standards to performing daily routine work. Since birth, we are surrounded by the advents of science. It has both merits and demerits. Personally, I think, in children, creativity is declining with excessive use of technology. I feel this for two reasons, which I am elaborating in the following essay.
Nowadays, children are more prone to gadgets. The kids prefer to spend their most of time inside the home. By using cell phones, playing online games, website surfing, watching cartoons. The various educational software has made education easy. Opposite, the fundamentals for solving the problems, are lacking. Although, for any assignments, from the school, kids are using the internet source, but are not willing to use their brain. My personal experience is a compelling example of this, which is mentioned below.
In summer vacations, I used to complete the homework by consulting parents, friends or sometimes, even the teachers. The usage of gadgets was not there. Only the source was the brain and imagination. Or sometimes, working with the classmates, enabled to share more ideas. This leads me to acknowledge how to work in a team. Performing daily assignments, without internet source, sharpened the brain usage even in tough times and polished me to withstand in tough times.
To wrap it up, I like to aver that though, the technology is a boon in scientific discoveries, but it somewhere has lowered the potential and lessen the creativity among children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.232 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90484836093 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4929392381 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.8421052632 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1578947368 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.47368421053 5.45110844103 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103577390583 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270747489176 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346890228084 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632532473945 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327593059675 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.