Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The advancement in science and technology has resulted in industrialization, construction of homes, roads, etc. This has lead the deforestation across the globe. As the population expanded cutting down forests for setting up industries, commercials, has affected the habitat of many animals and their existence is endangered. I believe it is important to reserve land for saving not only for animals but for some species of birds too, which used to migrate from one region to another, to adjust according to the climate. But eroding the jungles, has affected their living. The worst effect has shown in the food chain as the number is declining regularly. Grass and other small insects are consumed by rabbit or hare, then eaten by fox and lately fox hunted by wolf or lion. There will be a whole imbalance if hares are lost from food web. Similarly it was very common in the past, to see cattle, herd gazing in the fields, however now a days these are seen roaming on streets, as the huge buildings are built over those fields. My ancestral place, in my childhood, was surrounded by a long stretch of beautiful pine trees. Birds chirping in morning and evening was very soothing to hear. Presently, roads, houses are everywhere. A shelter to hundreds of species of birds lost and shifted to some other place. Blackbucks and single horn rhinos, a few decades were killed for trading their flesh, horns for ornaments, in Rajasthan and other central parts of India. These species were about to extinct, although bred in captivity at national zoo and now remained only few in number. In conclusion, although for human survival, shelter, food and industries for work are vital, still a suitable land must be spared for the endangered species to live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 841, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...alance if hares are lost from food web. Similarly it was very common in the past, to see ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 933, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...tle, herd gazing in the fields, however now a days these are seen roaming on streets, as t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 937, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... herd gazing in the fields, however now a days these are seen roaming on streets, as t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1567, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: few
...y at national zoo and now remained only few in number. In conclusion, although for human surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1567, Rule ID: FEW_IN_NUMBER[1]
Message: Use simply 'few'.
Suggestion: few
...y at national zoo and now remained only few in number. In conclusion, although for human surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90202702703 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67632184049 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5015388018 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6875 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146589846922 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357497072916 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639144889399 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146589846922 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.