Infrastructure plays a pivotal role in modern society. The issue regarding the construction of complicated structures has never failed to arouse public concerns and at the same time provoke a hot debate about whether normal people should sacrifice their business and houses for the construction. It is hard to deny that infrastructure create numerous jobs for a society and stimulate economic growth. It may lead impressionable people to become strong believers that people should provide space for construction. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. Accordingly, I, without hesitation, advocate that it's not always right for government to ask people to move. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following essay.
First of all, it will create huge inconvenience for people in the neighborhood, as many blue-collar citizens cannot afford the price of moving. To be clear, for people who have relatively low incomes, it is understandable that the cost of relocation is a huge number. No to mention the fact that many of them can not take a break from their demanding job to find another place. Therefore, the negative impact of relocation is clear even to the layman's eyes, and our government should take this problem seriously then make the decision.
Second, even the construction is so important and these people have to relocate, the government should compensate them for their financial loss. No one can deny that the government have every duty to make up for people's loss, as they make sacrifices to leave space for the infrastructure. Take the case of China, which completed tons of projects, including countless airports or high-speed railway network. The government will always give people who need to move a generous compensation. As a result, the citizens are satisfied and infrastructure are initiated and improved the life quality of its citizens. Had it not been for the emphasis on people's warfare, China would never be able to solve this dilemma and start the whole project.
Considering all the reasons and examples discussed above, we can safely come to the conclusion that the decision to ask people to provide space for construction can be problematic, which should be definitely attributed to the inconvenience for people and the duty of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...he cost of relocation is a huge number. No to mention the fact that many of them ...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...huge number. No to mention the fact that many of them can not take a break from t...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...locate, the government should compensate them for their financial loss. No one c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, i feel, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19948186528 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02894503755 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4767144127 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293769567668 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899834298558 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748608219596 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18434546123 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674570543031 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.