Widespread advances in technology have helped improve the overall quality of life across the world. Mobile phones or Internet are such examples. Mobile phones provide people with many new functions and make our life more convenient, but they also bring new issues like Internet addiction and less communication when people are too focused on their phones. In my opinion, from a whole perspective, I believe that mobile phones have given us more freedom than before. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following passages.
The first reason that should be considered is that mobile phones make our lives more convenient. In the past, if we wanted to communicate with others, our choices were limited. Whether using telegraph or writing letters is time-consuming and expensive. Nowadays with the help of smartphone, audio or text messages from two different countries can transfer in one click away. People have the freedom to communicate anywhere, anytime. It not only saves people's time but also make the world more connected.
Secondly, no one can deny the fact that mobile phones enrich our daily lives. The long commute or waiting time when we are stuck in subway or flight is tedious and exhausting. However, empowered by the newest technology, mobile phones are now equipped with the sum of modern entertainment. Whether you want to watch movies or play games, or you prefer to read books quietly, you can do all these activities on your smart phone. For example, when my mom took a business trip in the past, she often brought some books to kill time, but the weight of books were another burden for her. After she bought a new smartphone which enabled her to read on the screen, freed her from the heavy backpack.
Admittedly, the negative effect of mobile phones is still a pressing issue in our society. So many young people spend over ten hours staring at their phones and refuse to talk to their family members, even when they are sitting around the same table. Many people are concerned that the use of smartphones is the cause of various mental health issues. In contrast, this claim needs to be scrutinized meticulously. If we use smartphones properly and limit our screening time to a suitable range, the side-effects listed above won't be a problem.
To put it into a nutshell, the invention of the mobile phone is the fruit of modern civilization, not symptoms of its rot. It sets people free, serves as a convenient tool and brings us an incredible life experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i feel, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89953271028 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62485728247 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591121495327 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9768202767 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.375 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269085301139 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693070238637 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563212353597 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138418641018 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574359458926 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.