In this high competitive world, how to find a ideal job is the number one problem, especially for those new graduates. It has never fail to arouse public concerns and at the same time provoke a hot debate about whether students should take more practical courses rather than follow their hearts. It's hard to deny the fact that people who master more specific skills tend to have better jobs thus some are inclined to be strong believers that learning other classes is a waste of time. Such a claim has both factual and logical fallacies and need to be examined meticulously. Accordingly, I, without hesitation, advocate that students should have the right to explore their interests. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following passage.
First of one, by learning things they really like, students are more likely to have better development, as they definitely feel more motivated. No one can deny that learning your favorite subject is more exciting. It's beneficial for students if they can dive into their favorite subjects and have a better understanding of the material. Even their favorites are necessarily relevant to the core skill that job market want, hard work and persistence developed in this period is universally appreciated, thus they will never be wasted. In contrast, if your parents force you to learn some lessons on the purpose of finding a better job, you probably become more rebellious and even hate study at all.
Second, the fact that people will pay more attention to their interests indicates that students should study subjects they really like. It's true that technology knowledge is important, but if someone who have little interest take the class, they still cannot have a better grasp of this subject. Take the case of myself, my parents once asked me to take one semester's math afterschool class, as they believe it's the type of skill that company will pay attention to, thus bring more job opportunities for me. However, I cannot generate any interest to this subject and this semester become extremely tedious and painful to me, which made me hard to focus on the lectures. In the end, after this semester, I dropped the class as soon as possible. Had it not been for this experience, I would never understand how hard for students to attend a class that they dislike.
Nevertheless, a voice arouses that mastering certain skills is more appealing in job market. Ironically, it's only helpful in certain areas and cannot be overly applied to every fields without understand the diversity of the world.
Considering all the arguments and examples given above, we can safely draw the conclusion that it's helpful for young people to study courses based on their interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...his high competitive world, how to find a ideal job is the number one problem, es...
^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'failed'.
Suggestion: failed
...y for those new graduates. It has never fail to arouse public concerns and at the sa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re exciting. Its beneficial for students if they can dive into their favorite sub...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...math afterschool class, as they believe its the type of skill that company will pay...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, thus, i feel, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96095444685 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59629821902 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537960954447 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8084243754 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.35 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.05 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219101172856 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652120255858 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045918299968 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107020726492 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588250191907 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.